Where we are | Where we want to be |
Modules are usually allocated to individual tutors or external consultants | A team approach to learning design |
Individuals ‘write’ their distance learning (DL) course materials in silos, with little collaboration or support | Teams design courses rather than ‘write materials’ |
Production is content-focused, with little understanding of sound DL pedagogy or learning design | Pedagogical, technical and library support available from the start |
Content is just one component of the course; pedagogically sound tasks (or ‘e-tivities’) are central to all designs | |
There might be resistance to using high-quality resources developed by others | Existing high-quality content such as open educational resources are integrated into courses |
Printed versions of materials are often shipped to DL students at great cost | Printing costs are reduced through smart uses of technology, including e-book readers |
Modules are ‘delivered’ to students, who work entirely at their own pace and require personalised, expensive support throughout the course and fail to benefit from peer input | Structured, participative task-based collaboration provides DL students with focus and cohesion |
Some tutors may lack basic e-moderating skills | Tutors are skilled e-moderators |
‘Cohorts’ may not operate as such; structured group work can be minimal or non-existent | ‘Flexible cohorts’ maximise the impact of tutor input and peer collaboration |
Assessment is very traditional | Assessment is considered right from the start of any design process |
Assessment is innovative and capitalises on the online work carried out during the course | |
Pedagogical innovation is largely under-utilised | Good practice in DL informs on-campus learning and teaching |
The affordances of technologies are not fully exploited | Appropriate technologies are embedded within sound, consistent learning design |
Associate Tutors are on a range of different contracts with different responsibilities | Associate Tutors’ contracts, responsibilities, skills and support are agreed and consistent |
Learner isolation increases and retention drops | Increased learner motivation and retention through peer interaction |
This workshop is suitable for:
You will need:
(2010) Armellini, A., & Aiyegbayo, O. (2010), ‘Learning design and assessment with e-tivities’. British Journal of Educational Technology 41(6), 922-935.
(2008) Alejandro Armellini and Sylvia Jones, Carpe Diem: Seizing Each Day to Foster Change in E-learning Design Reflecting Education, Vol. 4, No. 1 (PDF)
(2008) Gilly Salmon, Sylvia Jones and Alejandro Armellini, Building Institutional Capability in E-learning Design ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology,Vol. 16, No. 2 (PDF)
Copyright © 2023 All rights reserved. PEDAC Foundation. -- Anywhere call via Toll Free 1-844-941-1001